.

Monday, December 31, 2018

A Different History by Sujata Bhatt Notes Essay

The poet explores the relationship betwixt heathenish identity and dustup. When you emit a row you similarly learn its finish. Lines 19 and 20 sum up the theme. Which diction has non been the oppressors dialect? When a nonher artless is the conquerer, that country brings its dustup and culture to those who be conquered.SUMMARYA Different account is in two linked split lines 1-18, then lines 19-29. The first stanza draws the link between western and Indian culture as tear apart, the Greek god also exists through Indian gods and goddesses that roam freely. She points out the distinction as well in the sort Indians treat books with much reckon, in eitherege not to disturb or vex Sarasvati or the tree from which the paper fixs. Stanza 2 returns to the idea of a foreign voice communication all(prenominal) wordss, it says, have once been the language of an invader or an oppressor, but disrespect this there al tracks comes a epoch when younger and newer generatio ns not only speak the oppressors language but they actually come to issue it. TONE (Tone message the attitude of the poet)At first the olfactory perception is critical of the culture of the west (e.g. the way the west does not show respect for books). Later the tone is accepting. She says that once concourse have assimilated the new culture, the subsequently generations love the language and culture.STRUCTUREThe poem is dual-lane into two stanzas with each dealing with a different idea on language and culture. The visual arrangement of lines differ in the two stanzas. In stanza 1, the different indented lines retrovert a wavy appearance to purport perhaps the idea of gods roaming freely and to see to it the humour in the stanza.The second stanza has all the lines indented similarly as the author conveys the undecomposed message that all languages are oblige by the oppressor.RHYTHMThe rhythm matches the content. The enjambement (run-on lines) in stanza 1 gives a light-hear ted, swooning rhythm. In stanza 2, the rhythm is insistent as the poet uses rhetorical points and the mood turns serious.IMAGERY top Stanza 1 begins by comparing the Greek and Indian gods. Next the poem focuses on the reverential attitude towards books in India. acknowledgment government issueGreat move is not deadhe simply emigrated To India Meaning- Pan the Greek god of nature also exists in India. The effect is that cross-cultural associate happen. Here, the gods roam freely Disguised as snakes or monkeys The poet refers to Indian gods in the radiation diagram of snakes or monkeys. And it is a sinto be uncivil to a book(repeated 4 times) By tell it is a sin the effect is of persuasion and emphasis. Repetition in a excogitation of three or more is a persuasive device. She uses strong conditions hurtle, slam, toss to stress that ill-treating books is unholy to the Indians because they have a reverence for knowledge. You must(prenominal) learn how to turn the pages gentlywithout disturbing Sarasvati, without pique the treefrom whose wood the paper was madeThe word without is repeated for emphasis. In India, books are handled guardedly gently to show respect for Sarasvati, the Hindu goddess of association, and for the trees where the gods are. *Pan- In Greek religion and mythology, Pan is the god of the wild, shepherds and flocks, mountains, hunting Sarasvati the Hindu goddess of Knowledge presides over the arts and is frequently idolize in libraries.POINT Stanza 2 the poet states that any while every language has come from the conquering nations and is at first resisted, it is later embraced by the future generations.QUOTE EFFECTWhich language has not been the oppressors tongue? This rhetorical question ( a question that does not withdraw an respond because the answer is obvious) contains the main idea of the poem all languages have once been the language of an invader or an oppressor. Which language Truly meant to slay someone? The repetition which language is some other rhetorical question which does not need an answer as it is obvious that language does not intentionally kill people. that after(prenominal) the torture, after the soul has been croppedwith a coarse scythe swooping out of the conquerors face- The poet now explains that it is the soul or the culture that is destroyed by the conqueror.The metaphor of the grand scythe swooping out is an image of the merciless destruction of the culture of the oppressed and refilling it with the culture of the conqueror. the unborn grandchildrengrow to love that unknown language The poet concedes that ironically over many an(prenominal) generations, the oppressed people come crook to speaking the conquerors language and what is more to embracing its culture. She points out the chaff of history.

No comments:

Post a Comment