United States Court System Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

United States motor hotel System - Research Paper ExampleIn spite of the belief that the adversarial system is a debate between two rivals, in reality a complex system of collaboration between judges, prosecutors, and abnegation lawyers is usually present. In the U.S. approach system, members of the courtroom work team create guidelines about how specific kinds of cases must(prenominal) be dealt with and what type of petitions is legitimate for particular kinds of offenses (May et al., 2007, 159). At present, the United States implements a threefold system of estate and federal official courts that often work autonomously, even though state cases ar often petitioned to the federal courts. The dual court system developed from the belief of the founding fathers that every(prenominal) state has to have substantial juridic sovereignty and legislative power (Cole, Smith, & DeJong, 2012, 105). The federal court system emerged after the nation gained its independence from England. T he active federal court system emerged as a concession between the founding fathers who preferred a powerful federal government and those who supported the rights of the states with a restricted federal government. At present, there atomic number 18 several independent court systems in the United States. Even though some Ameri shadow Indian communities and the military have their own court systems, the general U.S. court systems are the state court systems and the federal court systems (May et al., 2007, 161-162). Figure 1. Structure of the federal court system (May et al., 2007, 162) Even though state court systems emerged with almost no interaction with another(prenominal) states court systems, the state court systems that ultimately progressed noticeably correspond one another in structure and organization. Almost all court systems at present are structured in a hierarchical way (Cole et al., 2012, 363). The first major characteristic to remember when feel at state court sys tems is the difference between courts with appellate jurisdiction and courts with original jurisdiction. Because cases come from them, ravel courts are usually called courts of limited jurisdiction. These courts handle cases of misconduct or less serious offenses, cases of miserable claims, family disputes, and traffic disobedience. These courts seldom conduct jury trials and rely greatly on the judge for the final resolve (Neubauer & Fradella, 2010, 95). Courts of general jurisdiction handle both felonies and misconduct cases and function as a round-table for major complaisant actions. Courts of general jurisdiction, in numerous states, facilitate the first appellate level and give the accused who came from a court of limited jurisdictions the opportunity to open up another trial. These courts employ prosecutors, defense attorneys, witnesses, juries, and all the other players usually connected to American courtrooms (Walston-Dunham, 2008, 147). These courts are more formal than courts of limited jurisdiction. They operate under the adversarial framework. The modal(a) appellate court levelcourt of appeals-- is the subsequent level in state court systems. The important task of these courts is to evaluate petitions that came from resolutions given in the courts of general jurisdiction. The topmost court level in every state system is the court of last resortthe Supreme Court (Cole et al., 2012, 364-365). A petition can progress no further after the Supreme Court gives