Effect Of Authentic Listening Materials English Language Essay

Effect Of Authentic Listening Materials English Language actThis article is about the role of authoritative find outing material on bookmans want and how it helps them in change their breeding. Many researchers keep up studied about the regular(a) materials. They advocate the economic consumption of current material and gift different point of views, but they mark off upon one idea exposure, exposure to real delivery and real life, in other words, the advantage students get from being exposed to the phrase in authentic materials. The authentic materials should be used with the students level of lie withledge and the students should be aided by their teachers to deal with the difficulties they face.I entreThere be some definitions regarding audition. correspond to definition by Oxford (1993, p. 206), earreach is a complex fuss solving adroitness and it is more than just perception of the sounds. Listening includes cellular inclusion of mean words, phrases, cla uses, sentences, and connected dis fly the coop.In a nonher definition by Oxford dictionary, audition is defined as make an effort to hear something listen to the radio, listen for the bell, to pay attention, heed.Listening skill is a significant function in foreign spoken language larn. Among the skills, auditory modality is the of the essence(p) one.Furthermore, according to Saricoban (1999), considers listening as one of the fundamental language skills. It is a modal(a) through which children, young people and adults gain a life-sized portion of their information, their understanding of the world and of gracious affairs, their ideals, sense of values, and their appreciation.Rivers (1978) believes that listening is a creative skill. It means we comprehend the sound falling on our ears, and expunge the raw material of words, arrangements of words, and the rise and fall the voice, and from this material we create significance. He also states that listening skill is listeni ng with comprehension, attention and appreciation. Then, listening action needs to integrate skills of language, such(prenominal) as pronunciation, vocabulary mastery, writing, speaking, andreading. According to Rivers listening skill should be integrated with other skills. So in this case it includes not bargonly the listening activity itself but also writing , speaking, and so on.There are some problems regarding listening that Underwood (1990) mentions some kinds of them in listening that are directly related to the students themselves. One of the problems is based on the fact that students induce established learning habits in the sense that they have been encouraged to understand everything by listening cautiously to teachers who probably speak slowly and clearly. Hence, when they fail to understand every word plot listening, they stop listening and lose the thread, which seems to be the reason for the state of panic and worrying they usually target before and during liste ning. In relation to those problems, we cannot deny that students demand chances important role in learning listening.As mentioned in Brown (2006), another theme volition be motivation. I believe that listening and motivation are interrelated and influence each other . Because listening is so challenging, teachers need to think carefully about making the activities successful and the content kindle. We can create interesting and motivating activities when listening such as using English songs. Thus, the students will be stimulated and not be frightened or worried when they are practicing listening.There have always been a lot of disputes over the effect of listening in foreign language learning. Some believe that listening should be regarded as an essential cistron of foreign language proficiency, and as such plays an important role in foreign language programs. other claim that there must be a strong relationship between listening materials and EFL students motivation. As a m atter of fact,student motivation is an essential element that is necessary for quality of education. How do we know when students are motivated? They pay attention, they begin working on tasks immediately, they ask questions and volunteer answers, and they appear to be happy and eager. (Palmer, 2007).This article breaks a schoolroom research project to investigate whether listening materials increase the classroom motivation of learners, a claim often made but rarely, if ever, tested. But before getting started to describe the impact of listening materials we should take into consideration that what kind of listening materials do we mean? Are they authentic materials i.e. (what native speakers produce and write) or non-authentic ones (by which I mean materials produced specifically for language learners, e.g. exercises found in course books and supplementary materials).Many writers claim that authentic listening materials motivate learners because they are intrinsically more inter esting or stimulating than artificial or non-authentic materials . Proponents of this view include Little and Singleton (1991124), Freeman and Holden (1986 67) Allwright(1979 179) who refer to this as the classic argument Little, Devitt, andSingleton (1989 26) , who add that authentic texts bring learners closer to the target language culture, making learning more enjoyable andtherefore move motivating King (1990 70), and Bacon and Finnemann (1990 459-60), Swaffar (1985 18),. Far fewer authors give that authentic materials rationalise learner motivation because they are overly difficult Morrison (1989 15),Freeman and Holden (1986 68), and Williams (1983 187 1984 26),.Despite the fact that authentic listening resources are often seen as having the potential to motivate learners, Rost (2002) points out that some teachers believe authentic material is too difficult for the students to handle1(p. 125). Anderson and Lynch (1988) stress, encourage passive and unsuccessful listening hab its where the learners equate listening with sitting plump for and letting a largely meaningless sequence of sound wash over them (p. 45). Such a view reflects a general concern, no doubt influenced to some extent by Krashens (1981) input hypothesis, to find that task difficulty be set at an appropriate level. After all, closely teachers would want to eliminate possibly demoralizing learners with input too far beyond their. Apart from being dispiriting, exposing learners to incomprehensible listening materials can, linguistic competenceII Literature reviewMotivationD-rnyei believes that motivation is one of the most elusive concepts in applied linguistics and indeed in educational psychology in general.(D-rnyei, 1999, p. 525). he thinks that motivation is hard to grasp and is one of the central problems in educational psychology. A review of the mainstream psychology literature shows the difficulty of the concept of motivation along with the difficulty to conceptualize it. This difficulty in specify motivation is represented, on the one hand, by the several definitions of motivation, 1 and on the other, by the abundance of theories of motivation which are associated with different psychological perspectives on human behavior. In spite of the conceptual distinctions, however, most researchers agree that motivation is related to persons choice of a particular action, persistence with it, and effort expended on it. As Oxford and Ehrman maintain The external or behavioral features of motivation include decision-making, persistence, and activity level. The learner decides to choose, to pay attention, to engage in one activity but not others the learner persists over an extended time. . ..and the learner maintains high activity level (Oxford and Ehrman, 1993, p.190). 2These features of the motivated behavior are inbuilt in definitions given by mainstream psychology, as well as FLL literature on motivation. More recently, motivation is a process whereby a sure amount of instigation force arises, initiates action, and persists as long as no other force comes into play to weaken it and thereby prohibit action, or until the planned outcome has been reached (D-rnyei, 1998, p. 118). In mainstream psychology, motivation is defined as the process whereby goal-directed activity is instigated and sustained (Pintrich and Schunk, 1996, p. 4). In the FLL field, when in the early 1990s the motivation order of business was reopened towards a more situated approach, as will be mentioned later, Crookes and Schmidt wrote . . .teachers would describe a student as motivated if he or she becomes productively involved in learning tasks, and sustains that engagement, without the need for invariable acknowledgement or direction (Crookes and Schmidt, 1991, p. 480).As it is clear, in the above-mentioned definitions, (a) motivation is a process, (b) itinvolves goals which individuals have in mind and try to attain (or avoid), (c) itrequires activity on the par t of the individuals the activities that students involve in are accommodate toward attaining their goal, and (d) motivated activity is both instigatedand sustained. D-rnyei includes in his definition the phrase . . . as long as no other force comes into play to lessen it and thereby finish action. . . which is also encompassed in Kuhls (Kuhl, 1987) lock theory (again from mainstream psychology).Thus, D-rnyei s definition accommodates the possibility of the existence offactors which could intervene and weaken or terminate the persons action. Thelast parameter allows us to discuss the effects of the milieu (society/parents, school/ teachers) on learners motivation. In fact, the determination to incorporate the impacts of contextual transactions (Paris and Turner, 1994) in the discussions of motivation, has recently become obvious. So we should agree with him because contextual factors are essential in improving motivation in learners.The need to discuss motivation as carrying out in a social context, the classroom inparticular, spurred the boom in research and theoretical postulations in the early1990s. these discussions and findings have indicated that the interpretive power of the fabricate of integrativeness for motivation and accordingly, achievement in FLL to occur (Gardner, 1985) had been overestimated.The use of authentic materials has been widely supported and there is, as Guariento and Morley (2001) mention, a general consensus in language instruct (p. 347) that it makes use of the learning process. A principal merit proposed for presenting samples of genuine spoken interaction is that it exposes learners to those language properties that are often missing from concocted texts. As Willis (2003) warns, there is a serious danger that specifically designed texts will show the language not as it really is, but as the course writers imagine it to be or would like it to be (p. 224).Less apparent, perhaps, than the benefit from exposure to this real-wor ld language, is the affective role of authentic resources. peacock butterfly (1997) suggests that amongst language teachers there is a subjective impression that these resources confer apositive effect on learner motivation (p. 144). His study found an increase in on-task behavior and observed motivation when a variety of authentic materials were incorporated into language classes.An approach to motivation has been suggested by Peirce (1995, p. 17) she believes that investment would be a more appropriate term, signaling that learners invest in learning a second language in order to increase their cultural capital (Bourdieu, 1991). According to this view, the notion of investment . . . attempts to grab the relationship of the language learner to the changing social world (Peirce, 1995, p. 17). Further, rather than prioritizing acculturation to the L2 community, as many previous attitudes studies have done, the notion of investment focuses on the individuals self-identity as the locus of concern.1.2. Beliefs about ListeningThe importance of listening in language learning has only been recognized relatively recently (Oxford 1993). Since the role of listening comprehension in language learning was taken for granted, it merited little research and pedagogical attention. Although listening played an important role in audio-lingual methods, students only listened to repeat and develop a better pronunciation (for speaking). antecedent in the early 70s, work by Asher, Postovsky, Winitz and, later, Krashen, brought attention to the role of listening as a pecker for understanding and a key factor in facilitating language learning. Listening has emerged as an important dowry in the process of second language acquisition (Feyten, 1991). This research base provides support for the pre-eminence of listening comprehension in instructional methods, especially in the early stages of language learning.Listening comprehension has received massive attention in the fields ofapp lied linguistics, psycholinguistics and second language pedagogy during the last two decades (Anderson Lynch, 1988 Flowerdew 1994 Rost, 1990 Underwood, 1989 Ur, 1984). Results of the large body of research have shown that listening is not a passive process, in which the listener evidently receives a spoken message, but rather a complex cognitive process, in which the listener constructs the meaning using both her linguistic and non-linguistic knowledge. The importance of the listeners cognitive and social judgments in the process of listening, in appurtenance to the linguistic knowledge, has been especially emphasized (Rost, 1990). Some scholars believe that listening is an active process.in traditional view listening was regarded as a passive .Listening comprehension is viewed theoretically as an active process in which individuals focus on selected aspects of aural input, construct meaning from passages and relate what they hear to existing knowledge.III finishingIn the light of these findings, I recommend that teachers of adult EFL to beginners try appropriate authentic listening materials in their classroom, as they may increase their learners levels of on-task behavior, concentration, and involvement in the target activity more than artificial materials. (It is realizable to speculate that this would apply equally in intermediate advanced classes.) They may, however, reduce the levels of learner interest engendered by the materials used. It is important that materials selected for the classroom motivate learners, so one criterion for the selection of materials should be their effect on motivation. materials to be significantly less interesting than artificial materials. This stands in direct contrast to the large exit of assertions listed above, to the effect that authentic materials are more motivating because they are intrinsically more interesting. These findings are a preliminary indication that this is not the case learners were more motivated by authentic materials, but not because they were more interesting. These results also indicate that, at least for the learners who participated, interest in the materials in use is rather separate as a component of motivation from levels of attention or action and persistence with the learning task. For this reason it was not possible to say whether authentic materials motivated learners or not. None of the authors who assert that authentic materials motivate learners make this distinction between separate components of classroom motivation, I suggest that in classroom motivation research, treating these two as separate components of motivation would lead to a clearer understanding of the meaning of the construct motivation, and a more precise picture of the effects of different materials on learner behavior in the classroom.The generalizability of the results is limited by the small scale of the study and the level of the learners, who were all beginners. It could be argued that the topic (and to a lesser extent the activity based on the material, though these were similar every day) might have affected results. I was unable to control for their effects, being unable to reliably isolate and quantify their organic motivational level. One indication that levels of class interest in the topic or activity did not significantly affect levels of motivation is the fact that after day 8 of the study, the use of authentic materials always resulted in higher levels of on-task behavior and overall class motivation. If a motivational level of the topic or activity was a major variable, this would almost certainly not have been the case. They may well detain as a minor variable.IV ReferencesAllwright, R. (1979). Language learning through c ommunication practice in C.J.Anderson, A., Lynch, T. (1988).Listening. Oxford Oxford University Press.Drnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge Cambridge University Press.Feyten, C., (1991). T he power of listening ability an overlooked dimension in language acquisition. groundbreaking Language Journal 75 (2), 173-180.Freeman, D. and S. Holden. 1986. Authentic listening materials in S. Holden (ed.) Techniques of command. London Modern English Publications 67-9.Kienbaum, B. E., A. J. Russell, and S. Welty.1986.Communicative Competence in Foreign Language Learning with Authentic Materials.Final Project Report.Purdue University,Calumet, Indiana.ERIC No.ED 275 200.Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford Pergamon.Little, D. and D. Singleton. 1991. Authentic texts,pedagogical grammar and language awarenessin foreign language learning in C. crowd and P.Garret (eds.). Language Awareness in the Classroom.London Longman 123-32.Peacock, M. (1997). The effect of authentic materials on the motivation of EFL learners.ELT Journal, 51 (2), 144-154.Rost, M. (2002). Teaching and researching listening. New York Longman.Swaffar, J. K. (1985) . Reading authentic texts in aforeign language a cognitive model.ModernLanguage Journal 69/1 15-34.