The Positive Effects of the GI Bill :: Exploratory Essays Research Papers

The Positive Effects of the GI BillIn 1944 the world was caught in one of the greatest fightfares of all time, World War II. The whole fall in States was mobilized to assist in the war effort. As history was being make oerseas, as citizens learned to do without many amenities of life, and as families grieved over loved ones lost in the war, two students on BYU campus were beginning a history of their own. Chauncey and Bertha Riddle met in the summer of 1944 and seven months later were sedulous to be married. Chauncey was eighteen and a half and Bertha nineteen as they knelt crosswise the altar in the St. George temple five months after their engagement. Little did they cheat that in just the first years of marriage they would be touch with the effects of a significant historical event, the atomic bomb, as hygienic as government legislation, the GI Bill, that would not only affect the level of their lives but also the course of the entire commonwealth.Chauncey and Bertha honey mooned in the Grand canon late in the summer of 1945. Upon returning to Cedar City, they learned the intelligence activity that the United States had developed this wonderful bomb and theyd dropped it and it hopefully would shorten the war greatly. The first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima on August 7, and the second on Nagasaki on August 9. The official surrender came on August 11, 1945, formally ending the bloody campaign in Japan. The climate in the country was not one of alarm, in reaction to the bomb, but of tired relief. Bertha reflected this attitude. Those deal of our generation saw how many of their friends had died in bloody combat with the Japanese so they were grateful to see it ended. The atomic bomb seemed the long-awaited answer to cerebrate the war quickly.The bomb was not without its controversies and consequences, however. Before it was dropped, Leo Szilard, leading scientist in the development of the bomb, opposed it with all his power (Truman 68). His close con tact with the bad weapon caused him and others to argue against its use. It didnt take long after the end of the war for scholars to assess the atom bomb and its potential in future warfare. In the Yale Review, 1946, Bernard Brodie looked in depth at its future implications and influence on the bail of all nations.