Essay --

Lowi and his collaborators established four different typology for identifying and categorizing policy Distributive, Redistributive, Protective restrictive and Competitive regulatory. DistributiveDistributive policies take a resource from a broad concourse of masses and gives the resource to a narrower group (Birkland, 210). such policies can be controversial because typic altogethery only the small group receiving the resources benefit from them. This can lead to interest group liberalism, in which all claims to federal support and funding are assumed to be legitimise (Birkland, 212). Detractors of distributive policy argue that government is catering to clients often helplessness to find better alternatives (Mitchell, 2014).An example of distributive property would be the Hurricane light-haired Relief Bill, which was labeled Pork-Barrel spending. The bill would allocate resources to specific districts that needed repair. Those districts and groups would, theoretically, be th e only wizards to benefit from said resources. RedistributiveRedistributive policies are those that takes a resource from one specifiable group and gives a benefit to another readily identifiable group (Birkland, 213). Arguably the most contentious typology, redistributive policies involve taking any(prenominal) valued public asset from one group and allocating it to another (Mitchell, 2014). approving action is an example of redistributive policy. It was series of policies and mandates that strove to provide minorities equal access to housing, educational, and manipulation opportunities, (Garrison-Wade, 24). Institutions of higher education began recruiting minorities in efforts to diversify their predominantly white population. such policies were highly contentious as seen in... ...els. With phone numbers such as unemployment and minimum wage, the issue has been debated and no new legislation has surfaced. President Obama has turned to these workarounds of collaborating wi th companies that help draw rein his agenda initiatives due to a need for action. My argument would be, anyone that can founder to fixing a problem, no matter how insignificant the contribution whitethorn seem, has a responsibility t do so. One of my classmates suggested that it wasnt the chairpersons role to be involved in these matters. However, the role of the hot seat has often been to use the considerable prestige of the office to persuade people (Birkland, 108). As long as there is logic and transparency in interlocal collaborative networks, Public-Private collaborations, and workarounds to federal legislation, citizens will still have opportunity to translator concerns and dissent.