'Allegory of the Cave vs. 12 Angry Men\r'

'In â€Å" fabrication of the Cave”, Plato rationalizes that if you fibril a man to a wall where he can’t move his head or any other part of his body epoch there is a fire behind him with pack walking around holding things, he pass on eventually start to think the shadows are pragmatism instead of a lie. He then continues to explain that if you turn the man around and show him what was in sincereity behind him, he ordain non swear the truth but instead believe the falsehood of the shadows which he convinced himself to be reality, this being called fallibility.Fallibility is be as being able to be misled. Plato get on explains that if you take the guy out of the core out and into the real world, the reality of the world will slowly and with wide difficulty hit him, but he will slowly accept reality instead of the shadows he had taken to be the true forms of life. What if he would go back in the cave then and chastise to explain that the shadows are not a reality but instead a falsehood.Fallibility also shows up in 12 Angry Men when the prosecutors testify to form the record and testimonies into making it seem corresponding the young boy was guilty of murdering his father when he really wasn’t. In 12 Angry Men, a group of jurymans are presented with a case in which a child is accused of murdering his father, and all evidence presented seems to indicate this to be true. It seems the jurors are set on deciding him to be guilty, but one juror does not give consent, and questions the case. Through deliberation, the jurors change mind-set and see that the child could easily be not guilty.Only after much deliberation and argument, they all steady down him not to be guilty. Had that one juror not stuck with his gut feeling and voted not guilty, causing the equilibrium of them to deliberate, that young boy would’ve been sent off to die. This cater of deliberation also pops up in â€Å"Allegory of the Cave” whe n the man would go back into the cave and try to explain to the others that the shadows are not reality. They would not deliberate with him about it and in turn believe the fallibility of the shadows being their reality.\r\n'